- FAQ
-
How much can I claim for defamation in Queensland?
How much can I claim for defamation in Queensland?
Damages & RemediesOne of the most common questions in a defamation matter is: what is my case worth? The answer depends on the type of harm, the reach of the publication, and the defendant’s conduct.
Types of Damages Available
1. General Damages (Non-Economic Loss)
General damages compensate for harm to reputation, hurt feelings, and loss of dignity.1 Courts consider:
- The seriousness of the defamatory imputations
- The reach of the publication (a post seen by 50,000 people is more serious than one seen by 5)
- The nature of the plaintiff — a professional whose reputation is central to their livelihood suffers greater harm than a private individual
- Whether the defendant apologised or took corrective action (which reduces damages)
The cap: Queensland places a cap on damages for non-economic loss, currently indexed to approximately $459,000 (as at 2025).2 However, this cap applies only to non-economic (reputational/distress) damages, not to proven financial losses.
2. Special Damages (Economic Loss)
If you can prove specific financial harm caused by the defamatory publication, for example, lost contracts, cancelled bookings, or clients who explicitly left because of the publication, you can claim these losses without any cap.
Example: A Gold Coast builder is falsely called a fraudster on a widely-read local Facebook group. Three scheduled contracts are cancelled the week after, totalling $120,000. Those losses are potentially recoverable as special damages, if the causal link to the publication can be established.
3. Aggravated Damages
Aggravated damages are awarded where the defendant’s conduct made the harm worse.3 This can include:
- Refusing to retract or apologise when given the opportunity
- Making the publication in a particularly malicious way
- Repeating the defamatory statements after being put on notice
- Pursuing the litigation in a way designed to increase the plaintiff’s distress
4. Injunctions
Courts can also grant injunctions ordering the defendant to:
- Remove the defamatory post, review, or statement
- Not repeat the publication
- Publish a correction or apology (though courts are cautious about ordering apologies)
Injunctions are often the most practically valuable remedy, particularly for online content that is actively damaging a business or professional reputation.
What Factors Increase or Decrease the Award?
| Factor | Effect on Damages |
|---|---|
| Wide publication (viral post, major platform) | ⬆️ Increases |
| Defendant apologised early and sincerely | ⬇️ Decreases |
| Plaintiff has significant public profile | ⬆️ Increases |
| Plaintiff contributed to the dispute | ⬇️ Decreases |
| Defendant repeated publication after warning | ⬆️ Increases (aggravated) |
| Defendant established partial truth | ⬇️ Decreases |
| Post was deleted quickly | ⬇️ Decreases |
Is It Worth Suing for Defamation?
Defamation litigation is expensive and emotionally draining. Courts are increasingly willing to award costs against a plaintiff who pursues an unmeritorious claim. Before commencing proceedings, a realistic cost-benefit analysis is essential.
For many Gold Coast clients, the primary goal is removal of the content rather than damages, and this can often be achieved through a well-drafted concerns notice and legal negotiation without court proceedings.
Related Topics
Had Your Reputation Harmed Online?
Bell & Senior Lawyers advises on defamation claims across the Gold Coast and South East Queensland. We’ll give you a frank assessment of your prospects and what outcome is realistic.
📞 (07) 5532 8777 | 🌐 bellsenior.com.au | Contact us
Need Specific Legal Advice?
The answers above are general. For advice tailored to your specific situation, contact our Southport solicitors today.
Enquiry Sent
Thank you. Our team will contact you shortly.
-
Defamation Act 2005 (Qld) s 34 — general damages assessed to provide consolation for distress and vindication of reputation. ↩︎
-
Defamation Act 2005 (Qld) s 35 — damages for non-economic loss capped at the “maximum damages amount,” indexed annually. As of 2025 the indexed figure is approximately $459,000. Aggravated damages require an additional finding of malice or improper motive. ↩︎
-
Defamation Act 2005 (Qld) s 35(2) — aggravated damages awarded where the defendant acted with malice. See Bauer Media Pty Ltd v Wilson (No 2) [2018] VSCA 154. ↩︎